Some argue that crime stems from external factors such as poverty and various social challenges, while others contend that it arises from individuals who are bad by nature. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why I believe that social circumstances play a larger role in causing crime.
On the one hand, many believe that crime happens because of difficult life circumstances. Poverty, unemployment, and lack of education are often seen as reasons why people turn to crime. For example, individuals who grow up in poor neighborhoods may feel they have no choice but to commit crimes to survive. The lack of opportunities and financial hardship can push people into illegal activities such as theft or drug dealing. Moreover, social problems like inequality and discrimination can also lead to frustration and anger, making crime more likely. Supporters of this view argue that if society improves these conditions, crime rates will decrease.
On the other hand, some people believe that crime is caused by a person’s nature. According to this view, some individuals are born with traits that make them more likely to commit crimes. These traits could be a lack of empathy, aggression, or impulsive behavior. This group argues that even in good social conditions, some people will still commit crimes because of their personality or mental health issues. For example, serial killers or violent criminals often come from normal backgrounds but still engage in serious crimes. Therefore, supporters of this idea believe that it is not just social problems that lead to crime but also bad personal characteristics.
In conclusion, while some argue that crime is primarily caused by inherent personal traits, others believe it stems from social conditions like poverty and inequality. Although both arguments have their merits, I maintain that improving social conditions is essential. By addressing issues such as lack of education and economic hardship, society can more effectively reduce crime rates.